42-integrated writing
According to the reading gives three solution of protect birds from flying into the glass of building. But the lecturer think that none of them effective.
First of all, the reading say that one-way glass can protect birds but lecturer think the birds can’t distinguish the sky and trees are in the mirrors or the true sky. It’s more dangerous to birds, so that this solution can’t work.
Second, the reading also say colorful glass is useful but lecturer think it’s useless. Because people can’t paint whole glass with color since if do that there will too dark for people. And then birds will think the parts of the glass with no color is the holes and they will try to through the holes. Therefore, birds also fly to the glass.
Finally, The lecturer thinks that the method of the magnetic field would not be effective enough to stop the situation where birds fly into the glass. Because birds only have a long distance traveling like migrate will use magnetic field. For short distance flying they often use eyes to find the light to follow.
In a word, the lecturer think the reading of three methods of protect bird to avoid glass isn’t true at all.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 151, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tuation where birds fly into the glass. Because birds only have a long distance traveli...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, second, so, then, therefore, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 966.0 1373.03311258 70% => OK
No of words: 206.0 270.72406181 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68932038835 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.04421389389 2.5805825403 79% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54854368932 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 419.366225166 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.55342163355 84% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0532014297 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.5 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1666666667 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.3589403974 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 53.8541721854 148% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 11.0289183223 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 12.2367328918 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.63 8.42419426049 79% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 63.6247240618 44% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.2008830022 62% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.