Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Universities should require every graduation students to take public speaking courses. Give specific examples and details to support your answer.
Nowadays, the importance of providing more opportunities for students to learn a social skill is increasingly recognized. In today’s society, whether university should add a public speaking course has raised a hot debate, while I guess every university should require the students to attend public speaking courses. Giving two explanations below, I suggest my point of view that it is important and necessary to have such courses before leaving the university.
Firstly, the significance of skills like doing a presentation or public speech makes it necessary to offer a public speaking course, in particular for graduation students. Students are language users who the most frequently present their opinion to the public, and who often need to enhance their fundamental skills to improve the quality of their presentation. Take my friend John as an example. I am pretty sure that he could not cope with difficult tasks because he is annoyed with doing a final presentation or speech in front of the whole university and especially his favorite girl. So, to deal with this kind of disability, he found someone can instruct him to be confident—more exactly, how to give a speech. He was glad he found a good instructor and he finally became sort of expert on presentation, although it took pretty expensive. According to him, he was confused why the university hadn’t set up public speaking course which was a pretty useful course that could help students like him to finish those uneasy tasks. The importance of establishing this course was obvious and have to be paid attention to.
In addition, for graduation students, the vitality and demands of setting up this course seems become serious, which makes it more necessary require students to take public speaking courses. Graduation students always need to share their researches and perspectives to partners, their professors and the paper judges, and that can be a problem if they are not ready to show themselves on the stage. However, many graduation students don’t have time to take part in practices of this social skills, or their laziness reduce their enthusiasm. That gives a chance for universities to request them, insisting a kind of policy that they have to take such courses; they will ignore the importance of improving their ability of presentation otherwise, and this condition will also harm their scholar.
Consequently, the importance of possessing the skill of public speaking and establishing courses teaching this and the necessary of requiring students to take the courses speak for themselves.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-25 | Mehdiii | 90 | view |
| 2019-03-19 | Angelina2016 | 76 | view |
| 2019-01-16 | Angelina2016 | 80 | view |
| 2018-07-21 | Yuyinraoliang | 70 | view |
- TPO40-W1 70
- TPO31 Integrated Writing TaskSummarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. 80
- Tpo6-W1 3
- You may choose between two professors who will be teaching a course that you must take at your university. If the following statements are the only information available to you about the differences between the two professors, which professor would you ch 70
- 9-Integrated Writing 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, first, firstly, however, if, so, thus, while, i guess, in addition, in particular, kind of, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2177.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 415.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24578313253 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96720742961 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522891566265 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 672.3 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.2358212094 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.0625 100.406767564 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9375 20.6045352989 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.45110844103 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233324474957 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810185848073 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725833736193 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163409411637 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032998943382 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.