TPO17
The lecture and the article are both about the population of wildlife and specially birds. The author feels that the number of birds in the United State is declining and provide three reasons of support. The lecture challenges the claim made by the author. He is of the opinion that these explanations are faulty.
To begin with, the author states that icreasing the human population can lead to disappearing the birds because humans need home and dewellers so they destroy the birds habitats for the settlement porpous. The specific arguement is challenged by the lecture, He claims that this urbon placess can lead to decrease some speciec bot it is a good way to increase other birds population like Peagon.
Secondly, the writer argues that because of icreasing the human population the agricultural activities must increase so the habitat of birds convert to agricultural porpouses. The lecture, however, rebuts this by mentioning that the number of agricultural land in the USA is decreasing every year and they learn to grow better and eficiently.
Last but not least, The lecture posits that pesticides are harmful for birds reproduction and these pesticides get into waters and foods of birds. In contrast, the lecture position is that nowadayes humans are aware of the dangerous of these poisons and they produce lower danderous poisons and thanks to genetic technology they produce pests resistante crops.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 205, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...g and provide three reasons of support. The lecture challenges the claim made by th...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1205.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 230.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23913043478 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68245013977 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54347826087 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 371.7 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5459105506 49.2860985944 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.5 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06452816374 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369387647889 0.272083759551 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130141869075 0.0996497079465 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108102077263 0.0662205650399 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205038545578 0.162205337803 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0644915864438 0.0443174109184 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.3589403974 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.