TPO42
Glass is a prominent material to construct buildings, although it might be very hazardous to birds. They might consider window glasses as open spaces where they can fly through them. Many casaulties of birds are recorded every year. The lecturer thinks that none of the solutions described in the reading can prevent birds from hitting glass.
First, one-way glass might attract birds and increase the number of bird casualties. Also these glasses are designed in a way that birds cannot see through them, their reflection might work as a mirror and reflect the sorrounding environment. Birds might see picture of a tree or sky in the glass. They cannot distinguish whether it is a reflection or not and might hit the glass.
Second, the stripped painted design on the glass is not also practical in decreasing the birds collision to the glass. Birds might think the openings between the stripes are small holes and want to fly through them. Also the openings between the stripes could not be more narrow. In that case the rooms would be very dark.
Third, birds use their ability to sense magnetic fields just when they are traveling long distances. When they want to go from one side of a city to the other, they just use their eyes and brightness of light for finding their destination.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...increase the number of bird casualties. Also these glasses are designed in a way tha...
^^^^
Line 9, column 90, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
...is not also practical in decreasing the birds collision to the glass. Birds might thi...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 217, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...all holes and want to fly through them. Also the openings between the stripes could ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1086.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 222.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89189189189 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41044870629 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54954954955 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 419.366225166 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9787078398 49.2860985944 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.5714285714 110.228320801 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8571428571 21.698381199 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.14285714286 7.06452816374 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.525764846201 0.272083759551 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.186945101399 0.0996497079465 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754301162168 0.0662205650399 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.309917085358 0.162205337803 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0739547800449 0.0443174109184 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.3589403974 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 53.8541721854 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 11.0289183223 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.