TPO19
The lecture and the article are both about buzzers who personally promote the products to people they know or meet. The article feels that buzzing has generated a lot of controversy and provide three possible reasons. The lecturer challenges the claim made by the article, He is of the belief that these explanations are faulty.
To begin with, the writer states that the consumers should know that the people who promote the products are paied to advertise product and may give the incorrect information about the products. The specific argument is challenged by the lecture, he claims that buzzers merely tell the truth. The companeis look for consumers who are satisfied from products and employ them to not only adverties the merchendise but also give the people correct information.
Secondly, The reading mentions that when buzzers pretent they are private individuales, people thrust them more than advertisers. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by mentioning that people are very carefull and ask a lot of questions about the price, the arriving services and how long they can recieve the produts. Therefore they do not just rely on others and evaluate different aspect of the goody.
Last but not least, The article posits that buzzing can affect social relationships and spread of mistrust between people. In contrast, the lecture position is that because the buzzers tell only the truth about goodies, the connection between people can be stiffer and the comunication and social connection increase during the time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 219, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...rsy and provide three possible reasons. The lecturer challenges the claim made by t...
^^^
Line 9, column 319, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... how long they can recieve the produts. Therefore they do not just rely on others and eva...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1297.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 246.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27235772358 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60334356415 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573170731707 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4559409653 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.909090909 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3636363636 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.06452816374 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356767878072 0.272083759551 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121026316515 0.0996497079465 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854892709668 0.0662205650399 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18727737859 0.162205337803 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532200372761 0.0443174109184 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.