Tpo2
The reading and the passage are indicating advantages and disadvantages of teamwork; in other words, they look at teamwork from their view; both of them are trying to illustrate their point of views about doing an affair individually or in a group. Although passage emphasizes a team will be more successful, the professor has another view. In his perspective, its drawbacks are more than when someone performs anything individually.
To begin with, the passage alludes to a team will be more high-powered and speedy due to their members' ability which will be shared among others. On the other hand, the professor believes when you assign responsibilities to a group, some of the members do not participate in making decisions and putting the team in progress path. they are just as a 'free ride' who want to gain from the probable success of their team. If so, there is a cruelty to real contributors' rights because they play an important role in succeeding for their team but prosperity is just for the team, not the active members particularly.
In the second place, the passage claims that participating in making decisions give a satisfactory feeling to the group members who are working on their own optional work, not an obligatory one. but the professor asserted that making decisions in some groups last a long time by reason of their conflicts which make achieving a consensus so difficult.
last but not least, the passage alleges that a group is a place where the members have an opportunity to shine and affect decision-making; however, the professor states that in group decision-making, there are some people who are so influential. when they disagree with a project or a way chosen by group members, that project or way will omit from group plan despite the fact that some members have another view and believe they should keep on their trying.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 234, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...you assign responsibilities to a group, some of the members do not participate in making de...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 332, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
... and putting the team in progress path. they are just as a free ride who want to gai...
^^^^
Line 5, column 196, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...n optional work, not an obligatory one. but the professor asserted that making deci...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Last
... achieving a consensus so difficult. last but not least, the passage alleges that...
^^^^
Line 7, column 247, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...are some people who are so influential. when they disagree with a project or a way c...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, second, so, in other words, to begin with, in the second place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 314.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94904458599 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87726824658 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541401273885 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.3061290206 49.2860985944 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.272727273 110.228320801 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5454545455 21.698381199 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.54545454545 7.06452816374 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 53.8541721854 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.