tpo20
Nano-carriers considered being one of the most viable candidates in cancerous solid tumors drug release. In drug delivery, it is important to comprehansively study the effect of nanoparticles diffusion and distribution in the capillary as well as the tissue. The interstitial fluid motion greatly influences the penetration of nano-carries inside the tissue. The purpose of current study is to numerically investigate the penetration of nanoparticles inside the capillaries, capillaries wall and tumor tissue under the influence of interstitial fluid motion. In this study, the capillary and its wall as well as the capillary surrounding (tumor) are modeled separately and solved using a finite element based code. All simulation parts including the capillary, blood, capillary wall and the cancerous tissue were respectively assumed to be in three-dimensional cylindrical mode with a non-Newtonian fluid motion and porous media which is saturated with interstitial fluid accordingly. The results show that interstitial flow affects the distribution of nanoparticle diffusion by 48%. Also, the average concentration of nanoparticles has been increased by 72% for those particles with a diameter greater than 250 nm. On the other hand, nano-particles smaller than 250 nm have penetrated deeper within the tumor tissue.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, if, so, well, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 12.0772626932 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 22.412803532 22% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1126.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 194.0 270.72406181 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.80412371134 5.08290768461 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.49145290445 2.5805825403 135% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 145.348785872 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60824742268 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.321630187 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.111111111 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.44444444444 7.06452816374 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.09492273731 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0542055776905 0.272083759551 20% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0231750950398 0.0996497079465 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0255576412183 0.0662205650399 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0542055776905 0.162205337803 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.3589403974 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.8541721854 62% => OK
smog_index: 14.6 5.55761589404 263% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 12.2367328918 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.42419426049 119% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.