Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups, and all members of the group receive the same grade (mark) on the project. Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to evaluate students?
Evaluating is a vital aspect of every society. Growing the world lead to more competition between all indviduals significantely, so it is necessary to find the best way to evaluate them. Some people believe that students should get the same grade as one member of a group during compeleting a project, while others disagree and have an opposite view. In my opinion, I think that it is not fair and the best way to evaluate students is that to give their score according to their task in group for two essential reasons.
First and foremost, some students are lazy and do not do their task in the group, so it is not good to give them the grade like other members. By expanding the population, governments have to put more persons in one class consisted of about one hundred students which are different from each other. Teachers do not have enough time to follow one person’s performances. Therefore, they divided their students into several group to evaluate them. For example, when I was at high school, I had mathematics course which had one hard group project. My group contained four persons who were so lazy to do their tasks and duties. I tried to call to them every day to know what we should do, while they went to gym to swim and enjoy. I submitted the project but I could not write all details on time since nobody helped me. Unfortunately, our teacher gave our group bad grade which caused me to take course again in spite of all my effort. This experience shows me, it is not good way to give the same grade to all students in one group.
Second, if someone make a mistake in group project, it is not just to give other member the same score. By progressing technology, some individuals do not know how to use specific equipment accurate. So, in group project when some people make a serious mistake because of the lack of knowledge, it is not fair to give the same evaluation to others. For example, when I was at university, I had a physics course. In that course, all students should learned different software to complete a project which was so complicated. I spent so much time to learn my software as soon as possible, whereas one member fo group did not learn precisely how to use his softare. After finishing the project, we were so glad because we thought we get high score. Unfortuntely, we got ten from fifteen which hurt my average for going to university. As you can see, I wish my teacher did not give the same grade like other member in the group.
In conclusion, it is not just to give all member of one group the same grade to assess because some student are lazy and some of them make a mistake. Teachers should give different grade to everyone according their effors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 20, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'makes'.
Suggestion: makes
...dents in one group. Second, if someone make a mistake in group project, it is not j...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, therefore, whereas, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2218.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 489.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53578732106 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70248278971 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54933546803 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453987730061 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 713.7 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5028118223 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.72 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.56 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400781387228 0.236089414692 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12079216642 0.076458572812 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101697507391 0.0737576698707 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273562184547 0.150856017488 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018631541585 0.0645574589148 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 10.9000537634 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.