tpo20
Both the author and lecturer offer two opposing views on the side-effects of "let it burn" policy. While, the reading part lists some factors as the negative impacts of this policy in Yellowstone experience, the professor casts doubt on the accuracy of these specific points and mentions to some clues which illustrate the creative influence of this role.
First of all, the text names that the Yellowstone fires led to the huge damage to the vegetation and trees; however, the lecturer refutes this fact. As she asserts the fire provides the well-prepared condition for novel plants to colonize. This situation paves the path to the varied range of ecosystem. For instance, the big trees which endanger the habitats of the small plant required sufficient sunlight to grow, by demolishing of these trees new small plants have this opportunity to thrive in the park.
Next, meanwhile, the passage mentions to the destruction of animals' habitats as a cause of negative effect of this policy for the wildlife; the lecturer rebuts this fact. As she states, the suitable condition flourished for the plants is accountable for the animals' habitats too. The small animal such as the rabbit and hers which do not have this chance to survive, before the fire, now, they have this opportunity to establish new habitat. Based on their appearances, animals which prey on them initiate to dominate in this park. As a result, the new chain of food is formed. That is how the professor challenges the accuracy of this factor.
Last, the article presumes that since the tourist attraction of this park is destroyed, there is a local economy crisis. On the other hand, the professor argues the validity of this claim. Based on her assertion, this incident can lead to the financial failure if it happens each year. The reason of this event is related to a list of events such as the rare rain, dry climate and so on, which they should occur in the identical period. In contrary, this combination of disasters does not happen after 1980. Besides, after a year of that event, the park appeals the tourists as previous it did. Consequently, the fire does not possess the tremendous effect as it is surmised.
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'but', 'consequently', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'well', 'while', 'for instance', 'such as', 'as a result', 'first of all', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.252955082742 0.261695866417 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.137115839243 0.158904122519 86% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0709219858156 0.0723426182421 98% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0212765957447 0.0435111971325 49% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0260047281324 0.0277247811725 94% => OK
Prepositions: 0.130023640662 0.128828473217 101% => OK
Participles: 0.0260047281324 0.0370669169778 70% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.6167984484 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0307328605201 0.0208969081088 147% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.177304964539 0.128158765124 138% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00472813238771 0.0158828679856 30% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0141843971631 0.0114777025283 124% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2207.0 1645.83664459 134% => OK
No of words: 372.0 271.125827815 137% => OK
Chars per words: 5.93279569892 6.08160592843 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.04852973271 108% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.333333333333 0.374372842146 89% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.263440860215 0.287516216867 92% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.19623655914 0.187439937562 105% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.112903225806 0.113142543107 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6167984484 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 145.348785872 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532258064516 0.539623497131 99% => OK
Word variations: 58.4626653178 53.8517498576 109% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0529801325 146% => OK
Sentence length: 19.5789473684 21.7502111507 90% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9526522424 49.3711431718 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.157894737 132.220823453 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5789473684 21.7502111507 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.736842105263 0.878197800319 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 45.9230333899 50.5018328374 91% => OK
Elegance: 2.21794871795 1.90840788429 116% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.676822036488 0.549887131256 123% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.12534156741 0.142949733639 88% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0651006380232 0.0787303798458 83% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.595912507892 0.631733273073 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.155934022502 0.139662658121 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.331043298074 0.266732575781 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120668660797 0.103435571967 117% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.6090646661 0.414875509568 147% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0751223149564 0.0530846634433 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.555125611009 0.40443939384 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331508134249 0.0528353158467 63% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.26048565121 141% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 3.62251655629 193% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 10.2958057395 146% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.