TPO21- Question : Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
In the reading passage, the author claims that are three possible explanations for planting genetically modified trees. However, finding all the ideas implausible and questionable, the professor casts doubt on what is presented in text and states some evidence to the contrary.
To begin with, the writing suggests that genetically modified trees are more resistant than natural trees. This specific argument is challenged by the lecture. She points out that natural trees are able to adapt to some changes in the weather and some bugs. Also, she mentions that genetic modified trees have a uniform gene. As a result, these trees will not support changes in their environment.
Secondly, the author argues that modified trees promise to bring a number of economic benefits to those who grow them. In contrast, the lecture holds the opposite view. She says that these trees have a high price, because the companies charged the coast of the developing technologies. Moreover, those people who grow modified trees need to pay a tax for each plantation.
Finally, the reading feels that genetically modified trees can prevent overexploitation of wild trees. But, the lecture rebuts this argument by saying that these trees generate more damage for the environmental than the natural trees. Furthermore, she posits that genetically modified trees grow more aggressively and competing for sources, such as water with natural trees.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, in contrast, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1210.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 225.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37777777778 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74170713693 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564444444444 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3678797108 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4285714286 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0714285714 21.698381199 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06452816374 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.47606561146 0.272083759551 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174839439174 0.0996497079465 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119424825185 0.0662205650399 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.289094340212 0.162205337803 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101633990681 0.0443174109184 229% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.