TPO28
The author of reading asserts that there is some evidence which shows peary reach the North pole. The lecturer, however, finds the reasons dubious and casts doubts on the grounds proposed by the reading passage.
First of all, the writer mentioned that a committee formed that instructed to do an investigation about records of peary. Finally, they concluded that Peary reached the North pole. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that conclusion of committee was not entirely objective. She continues by arguing that members of the committee were close friends of peary who invested a significant amount of money on this project. Therefore, their conclusion was completely bias, and it was not trusted worthy.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that recently a researcher conducted the same trek at the same time and proved that it is possible to reach the North pole on the same condition. On the contrary, the professor underlines the fact that this researcher sent his foods by plan, so he had less weight rather than peary; it is not secret that it is much easier to move on the snow with less weight. Besides, weather condition was not as unpleasant as the peary's time.
Finally, the author of reading mentioned that there are some photographs taken by Peary. The position of surfs in these photos are on correct position that it should have been at the North pole on the day. The professor, on the other hand, dismisses this idea since surfs position in these photographs is not accurate. Also, these photos are blurry and fussy; thus, it is not clear, and they cannot prove anything.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (peary) must be used with a third-person verb: 'reaches'.
Suggestion: reaches
...here is some evidence which shows peary reach the North pole. The lecturer, however, ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, thus, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1349.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 273.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94139194139 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53266441318 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553113553114 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3269586501 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3571428571 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 7.06452816374 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380022207944 0.272083759551 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119149863746 0.0996497079465 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112572350637 0.0662205650399 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202723937264 0.162205337803 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0188546057983 0.0443174109184 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.