tpo3

Essay topics:

tpo3

Both author and lecturer present the opposite viewpoints about the painting which is attributed to Rembrandt. While the passage presents a list of reasons that this painting is not Rembrndt's painting, the professor mentioned contradicting points to refutes the discussed reasons in text.
First of all, the writer assumed that this painting is not Rembrndt's work since there is any inconsistency between the lady's clothes, while she has white linen cap, she also wears a fur collar. As the professor asserts, this inconsistency occurred for the sake of the manipulation happened 100-years after the painting is drawn by Rembrandt. As she claims, this painting is not original, and after a hundred year, the fur collar is added to the painting to enhance its value.
Secondly, according to Rembrandt's mastery in the light and shadow on the painting, the mistake of the illuminated face of the lady is an indicator that this painting does not belong to Rembrandt. On the other hand, the audio part rejects this assertion, since this error occurred because of the fur collar latterly added to the painting. As she posits, the main clothing of the lady is simple and white which reflects total lights toward her face; therefore, make her face to be completely bright instead of partial shadow.
Finally, the passage claims that since the panel of the painting contains several pieces of wood glued together, the panel and painting is not Rembrndt's painting. However, the professor casts doubt on the accuracy of this claim. As she asserts, the original painting is on the one sheet of wood, and extra wood pieces are added later when the fur is drawn on the painting. As she mentioned, the reason for this addition is adding the more grands and value to the painting.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 250, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'refute'.
Suggestion: refute
...essor mentioned contradicting points to refutes the discussed reasons in text. First o...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 296.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96959459459 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59563033592 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 433.8 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 1.25165562914 639% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3951494332 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.583333333 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.91666666667 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.