TPO32 integrated
The author of the passage illustrates three possible explains to the froglike underwater noises in Russian, while the lecturer in the lecture expresses an opposite view.
To begin with, the author claims that the strange noises were caused by orca whales. However, the lecturer retorts that it is unlikely to be the whales’ calls. Admittedly, there were many orca whales living in the submarines patrolling region, but they were also active in the surface of water. For that matter, sailors deep in the ocean should not hear the sounds made by orca whales in the surface. Besides, the sonar put them under detection if those parts of ocean were their habitats.
Moreover, the author believes that giant squid produced the sounds. In the contrary, the lecturer refutes that there are several facts against it. It is said that the strange sounds came into being first in 1960, repeating for two decades, and then stopped in 1980, yet the giant squid still lives today. Therefore, it has no reason not to continue making the sounds and such a theory cannot explain why it suddenly start to cause the noises one day and stop to do so 20 years later.
Finally, the author puts forward that it might be starry sounds from another country’s submarines that were captured by the Russian. Instead, the author rebuts that this idea does not hold up. The sounds can move around frequently and change direction quickly, which is impossible for a submarine. Also, with current technology, we cannot build a submarine that is so fast and quiet, so the sonar must have noticed such activities. This kind of records, however, were never reported by the Russian submarines.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun orca seems to be countable; consider using: 'many orcas'.
Suggestion: many orcas
...les' calls. Admittedly, there were many orca whales living in the submarines patroll...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, therefore, while, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 281.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97153024911 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43658180448 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619217081851 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.3210694142 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1333333333 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7333333333 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.39347410848 0.272083759551 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107624144653 0.0996497079465 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689390324021 0.0662205650399 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197028667218 0.162205337803 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106730969486 0.0443174109184 241% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.