TPO40 integrated
The author of the passage holds that it is impossible for human to habitat on Venus because of its extreme conditions, while the lecturer in the lecture expresses an opposite view.
To begin with, the author claims that atmospheric pressure at Venus’ surface is so high that all spacecraft and humans that try to land on it would crush. However, the lecturer rebuts that it is more favorable to establish a floating station like balloon at 50 km above the surface. In this way, the pressure problem can be perfectly solved because atmospheric pressure decreases with height. As a result, the pressure at 50 km above the planet’s surface is equal to that on earth, which causes no danger to our live.
Moreover, the author believes that water and oxygen do not exist on Venus and thereby need to be transferred from Earth. On the contrary, the lecturer refutes that we can produce them. Water and oxygen can be made from the planet’s atmosphere compounds – carbon dioxide, nitrogen and sulfuric acid, through chemical process. Besides, the fact that those chemicals can be easily accessed from atmosphere makes it unnecessary to worry about generating enough water and oxygen for the station mentioned above and human residents.
Finally, the author puts forward that there is very little sunlight reaches the Venus’ surface, ruling out the possibility that generating electricity through solar power. Instead, the lecturer retorts that the floating space station can also handle this task because it locates above the thick clouds that block 60% of sunlight. Also, by collecting both direct and reflected light at the same time, it facilitates not only the quantity but also the efficiency of electricity generation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, however, moreover, so, while, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 284.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19718309859 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68524183373 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584507042254 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7978713152 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 110.228320801 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378163862616 0.272083759551 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125548103008 0.0996497079465 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676863990482 0.0662205650399 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194576014407 0.162205337803 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619886763139 0.0443174109184 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.