TPO48 integrated
The author of the reading passage holds that there are several methods that can prevent frogs from extinction, while the lecturer in the lecture expresses an opposite view.
To begin with, farmers should be prohibited from using pesticides because they damage a frog's nervous system. However, the lecturer refutes that this restriction is neither economical nor practical. Pesticides are widely adopted by farmers as an effective method to protect crops such as corn and sugarcane from attacking by insects; otherwise it would lead to lower yield. Thus, if farmers in the areas that are close to endangered frogs strictly follow such restrictions, they are likely to suffer crop loss and therefore be less competitive in the agriculture market.
Moreover, the author believes that killing the fungus that have deadly effect can save the frogs, which the lecturer considers to be impractical. First of all, the ways to treat fungus infection, including antifungal medication, needs to be applied to each individual frog, which hinders them to be used in large scale. Besides, such treatments cannot prevent frogs from passing the fungus to their offspring. As a result, scientists have to conduct them again and again to every frog generation, which is extreme complicated and expensive.
Finally, the author puts forward that people should reduce water use to protect frog's water habitats. Instead, the lecturer points out that it is not human activities that mainly threatening their natural habitats. Actually, in the past few decades, global warming has been the key factor of draining of wetlands, lakes and marshes where most frog species lay their egg in, causing those frogs going to extinct. Therefore, limiting water use is unlikely to stop the continuing habitats deterioration caused by global warming.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a frog' or simply 'frogs'?
Suggestion: a frog; frogs
...om using pesticides because they damage a frogs nervous system. However, the lecturer r...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 66, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...forward that people should reduce water use to protect frogs water habitats. Instea...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, finally, first, however, if, moreover, therefore, thus, while, such as, as a result, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 287.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35888501742 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64601514665 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630662020906 0.540411800872 117% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1583434074 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.307692308 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0769230769 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0769230769 7.06452816374 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.490420790162 0.272083759551 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157865554135 0.0996497079465 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875667166622 0.0662205650399 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260179760326 0.162205337803 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784370862712 0.0443174109184 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.42419426049 116% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 63.6247240618 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.