TPO48 Integrated Writing
The lecture and the article are both about declining in the frog population. The author of the reading believes that there are a lot of solutions of this situation. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article. she thinks that all of those decisions will be pointless and expensive.
First of all, the author of the reading points out that a large number of frogs die from harmful pesticides. The author establishes that it will b a good idea to inhibit farmers spread pesticide near the frogs` habitats. this point is challenged by the lecturer. she suppose that if government prohibits using pesticide, farmers will lose a prevalent part of their crops.
Secondly, the author contends that fungus are one of the frogs population reducing cause. For this reason, people should disperse antifungal treatment on the frogs habitats.The lecturer rebuts this argument. she suggests that this specific treatment should apply for each frog separately. Moreover, offsprings of this injected frogs are not protected by this medicine.
Finally, the article states that people should protect natural frog habitats, such as bogs or lakes, form ecxeccive water. The lecturer, on the other hand, believes that the main cause of declining population ia global warming, so if people protect key water, it will not make any sence on frogs population.
In conclusion, I would like to say that there are a lot of solutions of current issue, but no one of them can be applyed for some reasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of the reading believes that there are a lot of solutions of this situation. The ...
^^
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... a lot of solutions of this situation. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made...
^^^
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...oubt on the claims made in the article. she thinks that all of those decisions will...
^^^
Line 4, column 57, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...e author of the reading points out that a large number of frogs die from harmful pesticides. The ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 227, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...esticide near the frogs' habitats. this point is challenged by the lecturer. sh...
^^^^
Line 4, column 269, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...is point is challenged by the lecturer. she suppose that if government prohibits us...
^^^
Line 4, column 273, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'supposes'.
Suggestion: supposes
...oint is challenged by the lecturer. she suppose that if government prohibits using pest...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 58, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'frogs'' or 'frog's'?
Suggestion: frogs'; frog's
...hor contends that fungus are one of the frogs population reducing cause. For this rea...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 174, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ifungal treatment on the frogs habitats.The lecturer rebuts this argument. she sugg...
^^^
Line 6, column 209, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...tats.The lecturer rebuts this argument. she suggests that this specific treatment s...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1260.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 248.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08064516129 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65790351454 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592741935484 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.9642949777 49.2860985944 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5333333333 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335367631989 0.272083759551 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108643458425 0.0996497079465 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765096914969 0.0662205650399 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165392039969 0.162205337803 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0822628738022 0.0443174109184 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.3589403974 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.