The article states that the strange sounds called quackers was heard in Russian submarines. These sounds were moving quickly. The reading provides three theories for the source of the sounds. The professor explains that some experts have done to find the source of these strange sounds but there are a lot of debates about this until now. However, there are several theories but there are problems for all of them.
First, the reading states that the strange noises were calls of male and female Ocra whales during a courtship ritual. The professor explains that the idea sounds plausible at first but finally refutes this idea. She says that even though the Ocra population in the areas where submarines were picking up are high, Ocra inhabits near the surface of the oceans and submarines were located in the deep waters. So they could not detect the sounds because of the far distances. In addition, if these sounds produced by Ocra whales, submarines could detect them.
Second, the reading claims that the sounds were caused by giant squids. However, the professor opposes the idea and says that the sounds appeared in 1960 and disappeared after two decades. Giant squids lived in the ocean and continued to live. So, it is not realistic to theorize this idea and there is not any reason to start hearing and stop hearing by 1980 and that is why giant squids could not be the source of sounds.
Third, the reading suggests that sounds were emitted by some military technology like another country’s submarines. The professor refutes this point and claims that submarines were held in one place and their directions could not be changed so fast as the strange sounds because these submarines have not been made. In addition, some engine noises heard but we don’t have a technology to detect engine noises.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le states that the strange sounds called quackers was heard in Russian submarines...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, third, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 307.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96416938111 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31758900428 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488599348534 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 458.1 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.4657406957 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6470588235 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0588235294 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.76470588235 7.06452816374 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.495802671104 0.272083759551 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150879269681 0.0996497079465 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067482724477 0.0662205650399 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.290819392663 0.162205337803 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0699898866215 0.0443174109184 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.