tpo34

Essay topics:

tpo34

The reading states that we are experiencing global warming, and the evidence for this is clear. Also, it provides three reasons to support the issue. however, the professor explains that there is no conclusive proof, and we do not know exactly about that, and he refutes all of the author’s reasons.
First, the reading asserts that data from sophisticated instruments across the globe introduced a warming trend. however, the professor opposes this point by discussing the data accuracy. he claims that although over the last century warm increasing were observable, the way of maintaining and controlling data can cause a significant change in results. Except for the US and European valid data, the rest of it should be eliminated as they are not authentic. Besides, he points out that there is no credible evidence of global warming after 1997.
Second, the reading posits that the secondary evidence acknowledges the rising temperature. however, the professor counters this point by providing an example of icebergs in Antarctica. he explains that icebergs breaking can be affected by two different processes, warming, and cooling transfer. In addition, although temperature rising can lead to ice breaking, the other unnatural happening for this issue are not known yet. Consequently, further assessments require spending more time and professional studies.
Third, the reading suggests that unbiased organizations such as respected newspapers and international organizations have considered the pieces of evidence and accepted global warming. however, the professor refutes this point by talking about the time of the published. he states that public newspapers try to publish the more fascinating pieces of evidence before evaluating data by related organizations. they write a story about the temperature rising without considering whether it is true or not. So, their alarming is not for informing people.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 151, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...des three reasons to support the issue. however, the professor explains that there is n...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 272, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...know exactly about that, and he refutes all of the author's reasons. First, the read...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 113, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...s the globe introduced a warming trend. however, the professor opposes this point by di...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 188, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
... point by discussing the data accuracy. he claims that although over the last cent...
^^
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...ce acknowledges the rising temperature. however, the professor counters this point by p...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 186, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...g an example of icebergs in Antarctica. he explains that icebergs breaking can be ...
^^
Line 4, column 185, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...f evidence and accepted global warming. however, the professor refutes this point by ta...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 271, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...alking about the time of the published. he states that public newspapers try to pu...
^^
Line 4, column 408, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...aluating data by related organizations. they write a story about the temperature ris...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, first, however, if, second, so, then, third, except for, in addition, such as, talking about, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1630.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 294.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54421768707 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.996218327 2.5805825403 116% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578231292517 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 419.366225166 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4043660557 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5555555556 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3333333333 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38888888889 7.06452816374 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0509952857143 0.272083759551 19% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0168113367431 0.0996497079465 17% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0132977712086 0.0662205650399 20% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0311829131343 0.162205337803 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0104774793899 0.0443174109184 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.2367328918 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 63.6247240618 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.