The reading passage and the lecture have a discussion on the reasons that caused the Steller's sea cow extinct. The author mentions three potential theories. On the contrary, the professor considers none of them would be persuasive with certainty.
First, the reading suggests that the sea cow was been overhunted by the natives. However, the opinion has been opposed by the professor with mew proof. The professor says that the sea cow is a large creature that one individual sea cow can feed many people. That is why the overhunt theory has been challenged heavily.
Moreover, the author claims that the ecosystem impacts the food supply of the sea cow. On the other hand, the lecturer states that if the ecosystem was heavily polluted, other species are likely the experience same extinction, but the sea cow was the only species that suffer extinction, which differs from the reading as well.
Finally, the reading passage believes that European fur traders participate in the result of sea cow extinction, while the professor in the listening material maintains that the sea cow population decreased before European arrived in the region. Thus, the reading passage has been refuted again.
Therefore, the speaker departs totally from the opinions on the topic made in the reading.
- TOEFL T P O 43 Integrated Writing Task 3
- TPO 43 Independent Writing TaskImagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion which of the following is the best thing to do Interrupt and correct the mistake right away Wai 76
- TPO 39 Independent taskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- TPO10Playing computer games is a waste of time Children should not be allowed to play them 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take basic science courses even if they are not in the career goal 83
flaws:
Number of Paragraphs: 5 4
better to have 4 paragraphs:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 21 in 30
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 12 12
No. of Words: 210 250
No. of Characters: 1048 1200
No. of Different Words: 116 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.807 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.99 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.448 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 81 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 68 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 39 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 25 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.169 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.392 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.653 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.093 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 4