tpo35
The author concentrates on several theories about the origin of the Voynich manuscript. However, the lecturer casts doubt on these theories and respectively points out the problem in all his assertion.
Firstly, the author argues that the manuscript has some scientifically or magical content which was written by Anthony Ascham due to some plant illustration similarities between this manuscript and his published book. Conversely, the lecturer challenges this theory and states that he was an ordinary scientist whose book's content was based on other famous sources. Therefore, due to the complexity of the manuscript, it is impossible for Anthony to write such an ingenious book.
Secondly, the author explains that the manuscript is possibly a fake book which was written by Edward Kelly to sell it to a noble. On the contrary, the lecturer brings the fact that people in sixteen's century were not so intelligent to make Edward put so much effort in writing this book and a less elaborated book was enough to deceive them.
Lastly, the author asserts that the manuscript is a fake and Voynich has created it himself to sell it. In contrast, the lecturer refutes this claim and clarifies that the ink and pages have been used in this book belong to approximately four hundred years ago and even if Voynich provided the pages from another old book, there was no way he could find four hundred years old ink.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, therefore, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1179.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 236.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99576271186 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70330681027 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580508474576 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 359.1 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.9261848469 49.2860985944 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 110.228320801 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2222222222 21.698381199 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2222222222 7.06452816374 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.3589403974 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.