tpo39
Both the reading and lecture are about a mass-extinction which its date returns at the end of the Triassic period 200 million years ago. Under this event, a huge number of species was eliminated in a short period of time. The reading provides three theories for this occurrence and then supports them. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article and finds all arguments dubious.
First of all, the author of reading proposes that since sea level had declined in the Triassic era; hence, it could have had negative impacts on the populations that were living in shallow water or near coastal regions. This point is rebutted by the professor. She claims that researchers believes that the level sea can fluctuate gradually, so in such a condition the coastal areas can adapt to this change; consequently, since this fluctuation was quite gradually, it took million years thus coastal habitats could accept this circumstance.
Secondly, the article declares that in the Triassic era, the volcanic eruptions may have released sulfur dioxide to air and this may have caused to global temperature get cool and in such a horrible situation, species could not have survived; in the contrast, the professor contends that Volcanic eruptions fail alter the temperature in a short time. She elaborates on this by mentioning that SO2 doesn't stay at atmosphere for a long time because it will combine with the water in the air and then it will return on the ground as acid rain.
Finally, the reading passage states that an Asteroid may have struck to ground then the its debris -due to this strike- could have remained in the atmosphere for a long time and blocked the sunlight for few years. This argument is challenged by the lecturer again. The professor expresses that we would not find any site related to an asteroid on the Earth. The only found evidence is a site which its date returns 12 million years ago, so this theory also fails.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 207, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...er of species was eliminated in a short period of time. The reading provides three theories fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 476, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...luctuation was quite gradually, it took million years thus coastal habitats could accep...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 398, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...aborates on this by mentioning that SO2 doesnt stay at atmosphere for a long time beca...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 85, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'its'?
Suggestion: the; its
...Asteroid may have struck to ground then the its debris -due to this strike- could have ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, hence, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 333.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87387387387 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54011809719 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534534534535 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 91.1216755954 49.2860985944 185% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.846153846 110.228320801 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6153846154 21.698381199 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06452816374 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.