TPO4
The article states that dinosaurs are endotherm and can keep their body temperature constant like modern birds and mammals and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that dinosaurs are not endotherms and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading claims that discovering dinosaur fossils in polar regions show they are endotherms. The professor opposes this point by saying that the polar regions were warmer in the past and dinosaur can easily lives in there. He also states that when the weather become cold, dinosaur could easily migrate to a warmer and better region. Also, they could hibernate like other animal in a cold climate and keep its body temperature constant.
Second, the article posits that dinosaur's legs are positioned underneath its body not at body's side suck as crocodile. In contrast, the professor says that there is a explanation for dinosaur's legs position. According to the professor, dinosaur's legs position is to support more weight and become larger. So, dinosaur grow bigger and have a large advantage on other animal and dinosaur.
Third, the reading says that dinosaur's fossilized bones have a haverisan canals structure. The professor casts doubt on this point by explaining that dinosaur have a growth rings that show its growth rate changes over times. To illustrate, he say that one of the characteristic of endotherm is to growth swiftly and dinosaur stops or slow their growing rate over a year many time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 219, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'live'
Suggestion: live
...mer in the past and dinosaur can easily lives in there. He also states that when the ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...trast, the professor says that there is a explanation for dinosaurs legs position...
^
Line 4, column 372, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'many times'.
Suggestion: many times
... or slow their growing rate over a year many time.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, third, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1249.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 241.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18257261411 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57341039744 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560165975104 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.0443377433 49.2860985944 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.0769230769 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5384615385 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.30769230769 7.06452816374 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.