TPO 14
The reading represents a method for removing damaged trees for the use of lumber and wood products which is beneficial for both forests and our societies. However, the professor casts doubt on this method and believes that it causes serious damage.
First, based on the passage, fires burn the trees in the forest. After that forest is chock with dead trees. These dead trees do not let new tree to grow since it takes a lot of time to decompose. Therefore, salvage logging is an excellent method that makes room for fresh trees. In contrast, the professor states that cleaning up the dead trees is not the right method for helping new trees. The new trees need nutrients which can be provided by the decomposing old or burned tree. By doing salvage logging we decline the necessary nutrients for the future generation of trees.
Second, according to the reason, besides taking space dead trees are a suitable environment for insects such as bark beetle. Removing dead trees by salvage logging removes these insects and their harm for the health of the forest. Nevertheless, the author asserts that the existence of these insects is not very dangerous for forests. There are many harmful insects in forests but also, there are other animals like birds that consume these harmful insects. Therefore, Salvage logging has more harmfull effects compare to these insects.
Third, the reading specifies that salvage logging has plenty of economic benefits. It produces additional jobs for residence and also, industries can use the wood of damage tree by natural disasters which may help the economy. On the contrary, the professor explains that it is true that this method makes additional jobs but these jobs are temporary and do not last long enough for people. Also, we have to consider that locating these woods need especiall vehicles like helicopters. These vehicles need experts to ride them which are an outsider who had that skills. Hence, the jobs do not create opportunity for residence to have a career.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ge, fires burn the trees in the forest. After that forest is chock with dead trees. T...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, third, in contrast, such as, it is true, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1681.0 1373.03311258 122% => OK
No of words: 336.0 270.72406181 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00297619048 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41880623093 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517857142857 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2171182699 49.2860985944 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.05 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06452816374 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.552039218551 0.272083759551 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167349297024 0.0996497079465 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0952571272532 0.0662205650399 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.325302033492 0.162205337803 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596833310398 0.0443174109184 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.