tpo21
The reading specifies that there are three characteristics of planting genetically modified trees. However, the professor asserts that although genetic modification has some benefits, it has serious problems and provides some evidence to refute them all.
First of all, the author explains that genetically modified trees are harder than natural trees and this feature helps them to survive. Conversely, the professor opposes this idea by saying that it is true that typical trees destroy easily but few of them do not die. Hence, they do not extinct. On the other hand, genetic trees are uniform and if they expose to counterparts which they did not design for it, all of them will die.
Second, based on the reading, genetically modified have some economic benefits for a farmer who grows them. One of this benefits is that they tend to grow faster and another one is that they produce more yields of food. Nevertheless, the lecturer states that trees which genetically modified cost more than a typical tree. The farmer should pay more money for their seeds and also when they developed, the farmer must pay money to the company each time they want to plant its seeds.
Third, according to the passage, growing demand for the wood causes many forests around the world being cut down and genetically modified trees help us replace them rapidly and satisfy our need for wood. Also, it helps us to save native and unique species of tree which is engendered by cutting. In contrast, the lecturer contradicts this point by reasoning that this kind of tree makes more damage than nature tree because it grows more aggressively and it does not give chance to natural tree to grow by competing with them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...its for a farmer who grows them. One of this benefits is that they tend to grow fast...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, third, in contrast, kind of, first of all, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 22.412803532 174% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 288.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91319444444 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43645860549 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565972222222 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3583682946 49.2860985944 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.846153846 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3846153846 7.06452816374 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.513039022414 0.272083759551 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183740602419 0.0996497079465 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100332863541 0.0662205650399 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.30067574094 0.162205337803 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0851645919758 0.0443174109184 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.