TPO 6: encyclopedias
The reading specifies that traditional encyclopedia are more valuable compare to the communal encyclopedias. Nevertheless, the professor illustrate that both of them are not perfect but there are more advantagous in using online one and provides three points to supports his idea.
First, based on the reading, communal online encyclopedia are not accurate since people who attribute to it, lack academic credentials. However, the professors asserts that, the online and traditional encyclopedia both have errors and are not a complete refrence. the advantages of the online version is that its errors can be corrected compare to the printed version.
Second, according to the passage, hackers can easily delete, corrupt and fabricate the online encyclopedia while they can not change the old verions of them. In contrast, the speaker states that, the online books are protected from hackers since their format can not be altered and also the crucial fact on the encyclopedia can not be change.
Third, the reading states that the communal encyclopedias do not pay attention to popular and trivial topics which can cause problem for people who use them. But, the traditional encyclopedias provides a considered view of what topic is vital. On the contrary, the professor says that the mentioned point is because of limited space which is not a issue. Academic expert exist and they accurately divers information which is a strong for this online encyclopedias.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 264, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...errors and are not a complete refrence. the advantages of the online version is tha...
^^^
Line 4, column 346, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...s because of limited space which is not a issue. Academic expert exist and they a...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, third, while, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1233.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 231.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33766233766 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90212524124 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549783549784 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2846004562 49.2860985944 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.090909091 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06452816374 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159478383006 0.272083759551 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710210661064 0.0996497079465 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565316382879 0.0662205650399 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102085668697 0.162205337803 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0142023720678 0.0443174109184 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.8541721854 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.