TPO43
The reading and lecture are both agnostids which existed 450 million years ago. The fossil that in modern-day remains could not able to provide the characteristic of the agnostids. The author of the reading feels that there are several theories that they might exist. The lecturer challenges the claim made by the author. he expresses doubt about the explanation of the claim.
To begin with, the author argues that agnostids were very small and free-swimming predator. The article also mentions that though it was a very small predator still it hunted plenty of smaller organism. The specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that for preying animals need very good vision for praying. But, it had very small eyes and moreover, for hunting other sensory organ is essential which is not specified in this theory properly.
Secondly, the writer suggests that agnostids possibility habitat on the seafloor, by the way, primitive arthropods living there. In in the article, it is said that they fed the scavenging dead organisms or bacteria. The lecturer, however, rebut this by mentioning that seafloor dwellers are not able to move so fast. but, the agnostids fossile had found from different distance. Therefore they were able to travel from one place to another. So, the theory is clearly vague and incomplete.
Thirdly, the author posits that it is possible that agnostids were lived as a parasite because many arthropods in modern days live as parasites. In contrast, the lecturer position is that too many parasites are harmful to the host animal and moreover it can kill the host organism. He notes that the researcher had found huge population of the agnostids. so, the third theory is not convincing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 182, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...de the characteristic of the agnostids. The author of the reading feels that there ...
^^^
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...several theories that they might exist. The lecturer challenges the claim made by t...
^^^
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...hallenges the claim made by the author. he expresses doubt about the explanation o...
^^
Line 7, column 130, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: In
...way, primitive arthropods living there. In in the article, it is said that they fed t...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 318, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
... dwellers are not able to move so fast. but, the agnostids fossile had found from d...
^^^
Line 7, column 380, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...sile had found from different distance. Therefore they were able to travel from one place...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 356, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...found huge population of the agnostids. so, the third theory is not convincing.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, third, thirdly, well, in contrast, by the way, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 284.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10563380282 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62628852006 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577464788732 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.37817713 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.5 110.228320801 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2 21.698381199 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 7.06452816374 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371429751327 0.272083759551 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093396903223 0.0996497079465 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0913155254432 0.0662205650399 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208188948841 0.162205337803 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0761359756338 0.0443174109184 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.