tpo44-integ
Both the reading and listening parts present two contradict outlooks, whether the European silver coin funded in Maine is a real historical indicator of Norse travel to America. While the passage, according to three reasons, considers this coin as the fake evidence, the professor, on the other hand, casts doubt on the accuracy of these reasons.
The first reason mentioned in the text is the long distance between the Norse settlements and Maine as a clue which there was no interaction among these two groups; however, the lecturer refutes this reason. As she explains, the Native Americans had come from the great distance and they used to travel prolong duration to obtain the valuable objects from far places. Therefore, there is the possibility of Native Americans’ travel to the Norse and bring back a silver coin from Norse. Consequently, the long-distance cannot be a valid reason for the rejection of the coin's authenticity as evidence.
Another considered reason by the article is that there was no other coin founded in Canadian site, so this solo coin is recently buried in site for misguiding; otherwise, the instructor rejects this reason too. As she mentioned, Norse did not stele in Canada permanently, and after a while, they returned to Europe. Thus, during their return voyage to Europe, they packed up whole valuable stuff, of which the coin can be one. As a result, the no excavation of extra coin cannot make this coin as the false clue.
Finally, meanwhile, the passage highlighted the uselessness of coin for Native American as another reason, the professor, on the contrary, denies this reason too. According to her assertation, although the silver coin for Native American did not possess the same meaning as it has for us in current time, or as had for European on that time, as long as it was attractive and unusual, it was considered as the important thing in Maine. Maybe they would not use it as the means for purchasing, they would use them in their jewelry or neckless.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Both the reading and listening parts pre...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ubt on the accuracy of these reasons. The first reason mentioned in the text i...
^^^^
Line 2, column 578, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'coins'' or 'coin's'?
Suggestion: coins'; coin's
...a valid reason for the rejection of the coins authenticity as evidence. Another...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of the coins authenticity as evidence. Another considered reason by the article...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nnot make this coin as the false clue. Finally, meanwhile, the passage highligh...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, however, look, may, so, then, therefore, thus, while, as for, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1712.0 1373.03311258 125% => OK
No of words: 340.0 270.72406181 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03529411765 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8768615156 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535294117647 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 419.366225166 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.25165562914 479% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.6068307932 49.2860985944 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.692307692 110.228320801 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1538461538 21.698381199 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6923076923 7.06452816374 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.421411495899 0.272083759551 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152332860918 0.0996497079465 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692766215956 0.0662205650399 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254377641639 0.162205337803 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461118659314 0.0443174109184 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.8541721854 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 63.6247240618 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.