1. Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-being of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make as much money as possible.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
The author asserts that there are two viewpoints about the duty of firms. One school believes that the major responsibility of corporations in the enhancement of people’s well-being; on the other hand, another group gave emphasizes to the high income in the format of the writ. In what follows, I will posit the possible reasons for both views and then, I will propound my standpoint toward the issue.
The first category which gives values to the well-being of denizens as the main duty of corporation seems to have a holistic and general view and considers this issue in and national scoop. It is obvious that highly-standard services have a direct influence on the enhancement of people lifestyle. For instance, in the case, the businesses in the food industry service the healthy and nutritious products, the people who consumed these products will have a healthy life in both aspects of mental and physical. The strong bodies and creative minds are the outcomes of these services. Therefore, society will possess a healthy and successful people.
As mentioned, there is another school which highlights the amount of earn as the vital responsibility of the corporation. This group may consider only one aspect of the issue and it’s the business. Indeed, the high income is one of the crucial factors for the increment of productivity by the workers in a firm. According to the noteworthy statistical data released by the Psychology Department in Tehran University, the income above the workers’ desire motivates them to work 75 percent more effective than the workers with the salary below their daily demand. In this case, the high income will be beneficial for that firm to be more productive and earn more in a cyclic pattern.
I should say that the first group’s perspective is the one with which I mostly concur. First of all, from my viewpoint, the considered reason by this group is more plausible and logical. Besides, I have more two reasons to rear my stand. Firstly, in the hierarchy of income and satisfaction of the clients, the satisfaction earns priority. In the case which there is satisfaction by the presented services, the clients are more willing to pay higher money. Therefore, by providing the well-being of people and satisfying, the chance of the higher economic benefits rises too. Secondly, a society which possesses a high-standard lifestyle for the sake of its citizens' well-being also owns a high-stand in the economical aspect. Therefore, the currency of that society will gain value and all the people in those cities will earn a lot.
To wrap it up, although there is a group which gives importance to the individual profit of the particular corporation. The consideration of the people’s well-beings warranties the higher financial benefits for the entire society.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, for instance, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2369.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 462.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12770562771 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98022709334 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497835497835 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 737.1 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 15.0 4.99550561798 300% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2590467447 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0869565217 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.65217391304 5.21951772744 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165296012247 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461771855226 0.0831039109588 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477599676028 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0954631064134 0.150359130593 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0239841970963 0.0667264976115 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.