Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-being of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make as much money as possible.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Contemporary companies usually are propitious to the society. This is because - although it selling their goods to consumers is their main virtue - without contribution to the society the public will disregard the company's products, especially for foreign companies trying to broaden their market abroad.
Admittedly, a company's main goal is to earn more profit. It would be ridiculous to promote CEOs that are not interested in making money because the employees would want the company to advance so that their position within the society rises as well. Obviously, companies that are more financially successful are also the ones that are able to provide a larger salary to the employees as well as a better reputation from their colleagues. For instance, to workers contributing in NGOs tend to be abstinent due to the fact that their corporations are not focused in making progress in the finances, rather they focus on the good being of the society, which requires sacrifice from their workers to truly meet their goals.
Nevertheless, a corporation that does not take the societies advancement into account may cause numerous problems. Entrepreneurs can have significant effects on the society by the products they bring to the world as well as the process to produce the products, and if either of these seem problematic, the public will show dissent towards the company. Hence, the company may fail to flourish. For instance, in the late 20th century Nike was indicted for exploiting child labor to manufacture soccer balls. It was patent that they did not care for the children who should be receiving proper education and that they were blinded by making more profit. However, after the incidents, people started to ignore Nike and their products so they faced huge sale and stock decreases. After that they had to change their company's policy to not take advantage of impertinent labor: the process was important to the public as well as the product to attract customers.
Furthermore, this yardstick towards a good process is especially strict to foreign companies trying to enter the local market. If the company is incompetent to provide any propitious effects to the community, the people will likely disregard the corporation. For instance, Starbucks was able to success globally by advertising that they donate a part of their profit to the developing countries: this act constructed the notion that by consuming Starbucks coffee oneself is contributing to the world, and thus enabling them to enter foreign markets with ease. Had it not been for this image, local people would have likely preferred their own brands of coffee instead, considering the effects it has on their economy.
In conclusion, although the main objective of a corporation is to make profit so that their workers can prosper, overlooking the negative consequences within the process would be a fallacy to watch out for. Moreover, this standard could be more stringent to foreign companies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 24, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'usually' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are usually
Contemporary companies usually are propitious to the society. This is beca...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 52, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'societies'' or 'society's'?
Suggestion: societies'; society's
...s, a corporation that does not take the societies advancement into account may cause nume...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2518.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 482.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22406639004 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79631720272 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497925311203 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 764.1 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.2424350608 60.3974514979 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.526315789 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3684210526 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05263157895 5.21951772744 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15810187817 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511334183153 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434227259203 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0904478753823 0.150359130593 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053009403307 0.0667264976115 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 100.480337079 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.