Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y

Essay topics:

Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

The contemporary society contains countless problems for the government to take care of with such limited finances that it is nearly impossible to figure out which ones should be met first. A sound approach to this conundrum would be for developing countries to focus on short term problems while the developed country focuses more on the long term ones.

Admittedly, since the budget of a nation is limited, sometimes even scarce for developing countries, they should prioritize the myopic problems. Problems such as poverty, epidemics, getting a clean water source, unemployment, lack of education all are serious problems that should be addressed by the government. It would be illogical to relegate government officials who overlook these situations of the country. Particularly, in North Korea people are suffering from severe destitute that they try running away to China or South Korea because they think that the government is incompetent and unable to solve poverty. Therefore, the governments of developing nations should invest on these imminent problems for the society to stabilize and make progress.

On the contrary, developed countries are relatively free from these imminent problems. Although it can be argued that poverty is still a extant problem even in the most prolific nations, these governments possess a surfeit budget to address the long term problems like the environmental problems or energy deficiency problems. Especially in the case of environmental problems, it would be effective to solve or mitigate the issue a soon as possible because the problem will get harder to solve as time passes. In addition, the lack of energy sources due to the limited natural resources should be considered right away because even in this moment, resources are getting closer to depletion. Hence, developed countries should focus on these problems that may take a longer time to resolve.

Finally, there are countries that require a harmonious budget allocation on both kinds of problems. Countries that are in the process of becoming a developed country from developing countries - Korea for example - should consider developing the industry and economy of the nation as well as invest in conservative technology. Korea is neither developed enough to concentrate on environmental issues, or is it wealthy enough to ignore the economy and poverty issues. All in all, some countries should find a good balance for their budget implementation.

In conclusion, the countries should decide their budget plan based on their national status.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 136, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... it can be argued that poverty is still a extant problem even in the most prolifi...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, hence, if, look, may, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2174.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 399.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44862155388 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89970146831 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498746867168 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 678.6 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6716276247 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.882352941 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4705882353 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.82352941176 5.21951772744 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163198359657 0.243740707755 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571289258824 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487810734093 0.0758088955206 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0932974487553 0.150359130593 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0593639279337 0.0667264976115 89% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.1392134831 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.