When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Major cities of contemporary society incorporate the traditional buildings as well as the modern ones. The precedence over which building should be built should be decided by considering the merits it can bring to the city.
Admittedly, the destruction of a traditional building may favor the city in many ways. Historical monuments may be in the way of development or progress, and should be replaced by modern ones in such cases. In the case a traditional building possesses minute value to the nation, while causing significant traffic problems, it may be removed to absolve the issue: Seoul for example, traffic congestion was mitigated after removing some historic buildings in the center of the city. Hence, if the removal of old monuments may facilitate the progress and development of cities.
Moreover, buildings representing humiliation of a nation should be replaced by modern ones. In Korea, in the period of Japanese imperialism, they built a administrative building to resemble the dominance over the peninsula. However, after regaining independence, Koreans dismantled the building and constructed in it's place a modern administrative building to show their right to govern their own people. To look at the bright future of the nation and forget about the dark past, replacing of historical buildings could be a good place to start.
Nevertheless, some historic buildings should not be replaced, but preserved to enhance the economy. Historic monuments are a key attraction for tourists since because of the symbol and meaning it contains within it, visitors are able to gain insight into the foreign culture by examining it. Clearly, more tourists mean more money. For instance, the JaKum palace in China is a symbolic artifact showing the preeminence of the historic Chinese empire. Millions of people are fascinated by this grandiose palace, and visit to spend foreign money in China which is a core part of the cities income.
In conclusion, replacing anachronistic buildings should be encouraged if the building is hampering with the cities advancement or, arouses bad memories in the history. However, some prominent ones should be saved to help the finances of the district.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 153, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...iod of Japanese imperialism, they built a administrative building to resemble the...
^
Line 13, column 582, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cities'' or 'city's'?
Suggestion: cities'; city's
...ey in China which is a core part of the cities income. In conclusion, replacing a...
^^^^^^
Line 17, column 109, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cities'' or 'city's'?
Suggestion: cities'; city's
...d if the building is hampering with the cities advancement or, arouses bad memories in...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, look, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 33.0505617978 30% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1871.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 349.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36103151862 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98943550816 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541547277937 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0610501352 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.058823529 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5294117647 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58823529412 5.21951772744 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294581099893 0.243740707755 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0974113608006 0.0831039109588 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726529930891 0.0758088955206 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170396845319 0.150359130593 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569093025883 0.0667264976115 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.