The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Without interest to any topic, we would not be able to make any kind of discovery. Human's proclivity to develop devices to help everyday life has helped the humanity and indeed these breakthroughs may be the ones that are closest to our quotidian lives. However, some discoveries require anomalous cognition that is irrelevant to our platitude surroundings.
Admittedly, humans are lazy but not lazy enough to think and produce tools that will help mitigate their idleness. Even when we were not civilized, we invented tool such as stone knifes and arrows which enabled us to hunt with ease. This disposition has become more evident and we feel exhausted even by the most gratuitous endeavors such as finding the remote: this compelled humans to develop voice recognition. Consequently, it is the interest in quotidian problems that invigorates us to make breakthroughs.
Furthermore, the substantiated ideas stemming from the hackneyed environment is the ones that are the closest to us. Since machinery presented to assuage our inconveniences are connected to the repetitive behavior of humans, it is usually placed in the reach of our hands making it more salient. For instance, a cellphone for example, is obviously made to help us communicate with each other instantly emancipating us from prolonged trips or writing letters. Hence, it could be asseverated that the propitious ideas stem from and surround our everyday lives.
Nevertheless, some breakthroughs require outside the box thinking. For instance, the TV for example is a anomaly. Nobody in the past could have imagined a box that presents moving images for the purpose of entertainment if we only focused on our immediate milieu. The imagination is what brought us here: TVs, cars, airplanes, smartphones all are groundbreaking innovations that could not been embodied without creative minds. To sum up, without aberrant thoughts particular humans, we would not be able to enjoy the lives that we do now.
In conclusion, although the notion that interest in trite things are a foundation of the most recognized discoveries, some require another level of sophistication. Without the bright minds of some people, the world would change much slowly, or may be even stagnated.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 104, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ng. For instance, the TV for example is a anomaly. Nobody in the past could have ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1905.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 357.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33613445378 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04714271694 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582633053221 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.7746337471 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.833333333 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8333333333 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.21951772744 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0682578355039 0.243740707755 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0222462506133 0.0831039109588 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.023088871105 0.0758088955206 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0355986355538 0.150359130593 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0207108312358 0.0667264976115 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.