Both author and lecturer offer two opposing views on the benefits of the computerized cars. While the reading part lists three advantages of the usage of these cars, the professor counters these specific points and presents some clues to call into the question for the information in the text.
First of all, the article posits that the smart cars will prevent many accidents and save the lives. However, the instructor casts doubt on the accuracy of this claim. She asserts that the crash is unavoidable in a case which the system of the smart cars fails. Moreover, since these cars will be packed together in the traffic, the damage caused by the accident will be bigger than the occasional car accidents. Therefore, there is no obvious evidence the damages caused by the smart cars accident will be fewer than the ordinary car accidents and they will save the lives.
Next, meanwhile, the passage mentions to the fewer traffic problems and community hours as the beneficial aspect of these cars, the lecturer refutes this claim. She states that for the sake of the comfort caused by the smart cars, the quantity of the cars in the routes will be enhanced because the driving will seem easier than the previous driving condition. In this situation, the faster traffic by the large cars in the streets will be abortive. As a result, the advantage of the fast speed will be overshadowed.
Finally, the reading part assumes that the cost required for the repair will decline in the smart cars. On the other hand, the professor challenges the validity of this surmise. Based on her assertion, the connection with the global position of the smart cars is expensive. In addition, these cars demand the particular equipment such as the sensor to be effective, and these tools are costly too. Besides, the repair of these cars is so far expensive than the occasional cars. Thus, the expense of these cars offsets the expected cost-effectiveness.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students who keep their rooms neat and organized will be more likely to succeed than students who do not 80
- Claim: Major policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts.Reason: Politicians and other government experts are more informed and thus have better judgment and perspective than do members of the general public.Write a 58
- tpo44-integ 85
- tpo50.integ 3
- 1.People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and sup 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 46, Rule ID: FEWER_UNCOUNTABLE
Message: Did you mean 'less traffic'?
Suggestion: less traffic
... meanwhile, the passage mentions to the fewer traffic problems and community hours as the ben...
Line 7, column 552, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...ffsets the expected cost effectiveness.
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'while', 'in addition', 'such as', 'as a result', 'first of all', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.265027322404 0.261695866417 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.109289617486 0.158904122519 69% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0874316939891 0.0723426182421 121% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0300546448087 0.0435111971325 69% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0109289617486 0.0277247811725 39% => OK
Prepositions: 0.133879781421 0.128828473217 104% => OK
Participles: 0.0300546448087 0.0370669169778 81% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.47373902355 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00819672131148 0.0208969081088 39% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.20218579235 0.128158765124 158% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0273224043716 0.0158828679856 172% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00273224043716 0.0114777025283 24% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1950.0 1645.83664459 118% => OK
No of words: 330.0 271.125827815 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.90909090909 6.08160592843 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.04852973271 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.324242424242 0.374372842146 87% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.245454545455 0.287516216867 85% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.181818181818 0.187439937562 97% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0969696969697 0.113142543107 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47373902355 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.539623497131 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 51.3620728568 53.8517498576 95% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0529801325 130% => OK
Sentence length: 19.4117647059 21.7502111507 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2274902921 49.3711431718 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.705882353 132.220823453 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4117647059 21.7502111507 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.882352941176 0.878197800319 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 43.9572192513 50.5018328374 87% => OK
Elegance: 2.85454545455 1.90840788429 150% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.549887131256 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.159787974705 0.142949733639 112% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0856205833033 0.0787303798458 109% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.711715771072 0.631733273073 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0968859867856 0.139662658121 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.266732575781 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.103435571967 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.683087945118 0.414875509568 165% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0961206685605 0.0530846634433 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.40443939384 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0528353158467 0% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 3.49668874172 257% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 10.2958057395 146% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.