tpo5
The passage and the talk both discuss the fact about how the dwelling of one of the cities in New Mexico in United State used the great houses. The writer contends three theories related to great houses by it's used for residential , using for store foods, and used for ceremonies as well. However, the narrator refutes the auther's assessment and he demonstrate three reasons to cast doubted of the claims made in the passage.
The first allegation of the script against which the orator argues is the great houses used solely for residential because the
first theory suggest that for each house hundreds of people can live in it. Foe instance, it considered like apartment building which plethora of people lived their for decades. But the lecturer poses that the great houses look hug from outside only. In contrast to inside which seems it doesn't compensate hundreds of people because there are no enough fireplaces to cook. For example, more than one hundred rooms couldn't consider residential .
Second, according to the text, that these buildings used for storing the foods supplies as well. Moreover, foods can last long without impact the food's quality. Though, the speaker find this idea is debatable. He bolsters his opinion by stating that the excavation uncovered the green maize or container. In contrast to the fact that their is a lot of spoil green maize on the floor addition to remain a lot of containers.
Finally, the reading passage believe that the great houses used for ceremonies. For gathering people they can find broken pots. But the aerator said that a lot of materials beside broken pots which found. Like for example, stone, sand, and construction materials as well. He agree that all these material should through it away or trash it. So that's what he suggest that the reading was not provided enough evidence.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 231, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...great houses by its used for residential , using for store foods, and used for cer...
^^
Line 1, column 350, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'demonstrates'.
Suggestion: demonstrates
...r refutes the authers assessment and he demonstrate three reasons to cast doubted of the cl...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 127, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... used solely for residential because the first theory suggest that for each house...
^^^
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...y. In contrast to inside which seems it doesnt compensate hundreds of people because t...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 415, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...or example, more than one hundred rooms couldnt consider residential . ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 443, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ndred rooms couldnt consider residential . ...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d rooms couldnt consider residential . Second, according to the text, that thes...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... long without impact the foods quality. Though, the speaker find this idea is debatabl...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 335, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...container. In contrast to the fact that their is a lot of spoil green maize on the fl...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 424, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...addition to remain a lot of containers. Finally, the reading passage believe tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 276, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'agrees'.
Suggestion: agrees
... and construction materials as well. He agree that all these material should through ...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 345, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
... should through it away or trash it. So thats what he suggest that the reading was no...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 359, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'suggests'.
Suggestion: suggests
...h it away or trash it. So thats what he suggest that the reading was not provided enoug...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, look, moreover, second, so, well, for example, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 310.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95483870968 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39142087886 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 145.348785872 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577419354839 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.8523021846 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.8421052632 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3157894737 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47368421053 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 4.19205298013 310% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.3589403974 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.