TPO50 Task1
The author is of the opinion that going to the Mars is not a reasoning target for the human because of some unsolved issues and provides three reasons to it. On the other hand, the professor states that these reasons are unconvincing by refuting each reasons.
First, the reading claims that affording supplements such as food, water, and oxygen is a problem for Mars mission. However the Speaker says that by applying hydroponic technique in agriculture they can provides food, oxygen and water for astronomers. The mentioned method means growing vegetables in the water instead of soil. By this way, it will be possible to transfer easily plants by spacecraft. One of the benefits of hydroponic planetary in addition to supply food is recycling waste water to healthy water and provide fresh water for astronomers. Another advantage is that herbals can absorb carbon dioxide and release oxygen instead of that. Finally the hydroponic agriculture provides food, water and oxygen for astronomers.
Second, the author states that being exposed to zero-gravity is a serious problem for astronomers in space travel. Conversely, the lecturer contends that they can utilize several methods to control issues of zero-gravity such as bone diversity decrease. Then she provides some evidences of developments in technologies in health monitoring in astronomers. Finally she states that these developments explains this issue is not important to considering.
Third, the article mentions that the radiation released by the sun is absolutely perish and will harm the astronomers. On the contrary, the professor asserts that actually scientists assert that the sun radiation is not at dangerous level all the time. She asserts that the specialists invent some equipment to control the direction and the time of hazardous radiations. If a side of spacecraft is on the deadly radiation, the equipment can detect this danger and alarm so the astronomers move to the other side of vessel and rescue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...d oxygen is a problem for Mars mission. However the Speaker says that by applying hydro...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'provide'
Suggestion: provide
...ponic technique in agriculture they can provides food, oxygen and water for astronomers....
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 653, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...ide and release oxygen instead of that. Finally the hydroponic agriculture provides foo...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ood, water and oxygen for astronomers. Second, the author states that being exp...
^^^
Line 5, column 357, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...es in health monitoring in astronomers. Finally she states that these developments expl...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 82, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'perished'.
Suggestion: perished
...ation released by the sun is absolutely perish and will harm the astronomers. On the ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, conversely, finally, first, however, if, second, so, then, third, in addition, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 1373.03311258 122% => OK
No of words: 316.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3164556962 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87095611952 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518987341772 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 419.366225166 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.8526673525 49.2860985944 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.8235294118 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5882352941 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76470588235 7.06452816374 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 63.6247240618 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.