TPO53
According to the passage, the taxes allocation to cigarettes and other unhealthy commodities benefits all sectors of society. the lecture, however, thinks this matter can be challenging.
First, the passage explains that high taxes prevent people from doing harmful behaviors. This idea is refuted by the lecture, which claims that in this situation people buy cheaper and lower quality cigarettes. These cigarettes are more harmful than other cigarettes. Also, people buy expensive unhealthy food, hence, they will not enough money to spend on healthy food.
Second, the passage argues that high taxes for these products are unbiased. The lecture, on the contrary, disagrees with this belief, suggesting the policy is unfair. The governments do not consider this fact that the addictive of these products are both poor and rich people. Therefore, these policies are not fair for those people who do not have adequate income.
Third, the author of the passage writes that high taxes on cigarettes have a considerable impact on the government's profits, and the government uses this income to improve the style of living. The lecture, in contrast, states that the government's income of this policy is millions of dollars. The government does not want to reduce harmful behaviors in society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 31, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'taxes'' or 'tax's', 'taxis's'?
Suggestion: taxes'; tax's; taxis's
According to the passage, the taxes allocation to cigarettes and other unhe...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...dities benefits all sectors of society. the lecture, however, thinks this matter ca...
^^^
Line 4, column 235, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...e lecture, in contrast, states that the governments income of this policy is millions of do...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, second, so, therefore, third, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1088.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 204.0 270.72406181 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60575989326 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 145.348785872 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563725490196 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 336.6 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1184848127 49.2860985944 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.6923076923 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6923076923 21.698381199 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69230769231 7.06452816374 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.