TPO9 - integrated task
Both the article and the lecture discuss the hydrogen-based full-cell engine, the so-called promising alternative source of energy for cars. On one hand, the article argues that this kind of engine has numerous advantage over the conventional internal-combustion engines. On the other hand, the professor opposes by stating that the reading’s author was too optimistic about the new engines’ future.
First and foremost, the reading claims that fuel-cell engines are easily available, contradictory to the fact that internal-combustion engine relies on petroleum, which is a limited source. However, the professor refutes this point by saying that the hydrogen is not usable in the initial water form, but it has to be transformed and stored in a pure liquid state, which is difficult to do. Moreover, he states that we don’t have the technology to do that yet.
In addition, the article posits that hydrogen-based fuel cells will solve the pollution problems in the world. Nonetheless, the professor casts doubt on this point by emphasizing that the process to produce pure hydrogen will, in fact, cause pollution. According to the professor, this process uses burning coal and oil so that the factory in which it occurs will pollute the environment.
Last but not least, the reading’s author indicates that fuel-cell engines will be economically competitive since people will spend less money to operate them. In contrast, the professor rebuts this argument. He argues that those engines include an expensive component: platinum. As a result, it won’t cost the consumers less to operate them. Additionally, other components than platinum have been tried out but none of them turned out to be successful.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Both the article and the lecture discuss...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...istic about the new engines’ future. First and foremost, the reading claims t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... have the technology to do that yet. In addition, the article posits that hyd...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...occurs will pollute the environment. Last but not least, the reading’s author...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'nonetheless', 'so', 'as to', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'in fact', 'kind of', 'as a result', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.256578947368 0.261695866417 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.148026315789 0.158904122519 93% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0822368421053 0.0723426182421 114% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0361842105263 0.0435111971325 83% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0296052631579 0.0277247811725 107% => OK
Prepositions: 0.115131578947 0.128828473217 89% => OK
Participles: 0.0296052631579 0.0370669169778 80% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.06531773875 2.5805825403 119% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0296052631579 0.0208969081088 142% => OK
Particles: 0.00657894736842 0.00154638098197 425% => OK
Determiners: 0.128289473684 0.128158765124 100% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0164473684211 0.0158828679856 104% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00986842105263 0.0114777025283 86% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1765.0 1645.83664459 107% => OK
No of words: 270.0 271.125827815 100% => OK
Chars per words: 6.53703703704 6.08160592843 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.04852973271 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.4 0.374372842146 107% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.311111111111 0.287516216867 108% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.203703703704 0.187439937562 109% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.177777777778 0.113142543107 157% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06531773875 2.5805825403 119% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.539623497131 111% => OK
Word variations: 64.1146970331 53.8517498576 119% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0529801325 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.2857142857 21.7502111507 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6129042373 49.3711431718 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.071428571 132.220823453 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 21.7502111507 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.878197800319 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.39072847682 118% => OK
Readability: 50.3968253968 50.5018328374 100% => OK
Elegance: 1.87692307692 1.90840788429 98% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.549887131256 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.12876571444 0.142949733639 90% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0886572773352 0.0787303798458 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.600462528616 0.631733273073 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.169984948509 0.139662658121 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.266732575781 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.103435571967 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.386821924341 0.414875509568 93% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.084375071486 0.0530846634433 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.40443939384 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0528353158467 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.26048565121 47% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.62251655629 166% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.2958057395 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.