TPPO 35 integrated
Both reading and lecture are about the author of a mysterious manuscript. The writer suggests three persons as the probable authors. Conversely, the lecturer believes that none of them can be the author of the book.
First, the passage asserts that Ascham, a botanist, is the book's author because of the similarities between his works and the manuscript. On the contrary, the lecturer refutes this claim. He believes that Ascham's books are too ordinary and his knowledge comes from other sources, and plants inside his books are common plants. Hence, he did not need to use these elaborated words in a coded way.
Second, the writer claims that Kelley, a person who was good at fooling people, made that manuscript with his own made-up words. Alternatively, the man in the lecture believes that people in the 16'th century were too naive that Kelley did not need to make that complicated book. If he was the author, he could have made a simpler book without so much work.
Lastly, the reading suggests that Vonyich, an antique book dealer, created a fake book as an old manuscript. On the other hand, the lecturer asserts that there are some modern techniques to examine the age of manuscripts nowadays. The ink and the paper used for the book are 400 years old. If Vonyich wanted to create a fake book, he could use some 400 years old papers from other manuscripts, but there is no way he could obtain 400 years old ink. Therefore, Vonich could not create the book.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, hence, if, lastly, second, so, therefore, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1213.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 256.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73828125 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43524221857 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55859375 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.9101862594 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.8666666667 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0666666667 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.3589403974 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 53.8541721854 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.2367328918 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.