The reading and the lecture are both about the 52-hertz whales that have uncommon song among the other whales. More specifically, in regard to the passage, the writer presents three theories about the reasons of this unusal high-pitched song. The lecturer disputes the claims made in the article. His position is that all these clues are flawed and this still a mysterious.
First and foremost, the author of the reading states these whales are hybrid from odd whales species which have common features from both parents. The article mentions that hybrid whales have different songs than their parents. This argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that these whales are not hybrid, because hybrid whales have unusal pattern of migration and on other sides of usual whales. Additionally, he points out that these whales does not have any uncommon migration pattern.
Secondly, the author suggests 52-hertz whales have lack of hearing, so they learn how to sing by listening to the other whales around them like humans. In the article it is said that their song are different because they cannot hear. Again, the professor specifically addresses this point when he states increasing the pitch is depending on throat like human, and does not cause any damage of hearing. He goes on to say that there is no relation between damage hearing and throat.
Finally, the author brings his argument to a close by suggesting that 52-hertz whales are the only left members from their specise and the others died out in thr past. Not surprisingly, the lecturer takes issue with this claim by contending that even if these whales are rare where is thier parents?. He notes that the advanced technolgy can hear or record any type of these songs, but no record for this type of songs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 361, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...l these clues are flawed and this still a mysterious. First and foremost, the author of t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 326, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...int when he states increasing the pitch is depending on throat like human, and does not caus...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1487.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 300.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95666666667 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35578484209 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8541093377 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.9375 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 7.06452816374 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2319332889 0.272083759551 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805556385159 0.0996497079465 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689667554503 0.0662205650399 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145182973791 0.162205337803 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513085300368 0.0443174109184 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.