Vol 3 ETS Essay 1
Reading and lecture discusses about validity of events and stories depicted
in the memoir created by Chevalier. Reading states that Chevalier may have
added interesting stories in his memoir to allure people. While, lecture argues that his memoir was guenuine and based on true stories.
First, reading states that Chevalier was addicted to game and parties and also borrowed money from other swiss merchant. Reading points out that if he was affluent there was no need for him to acquire money. Lecture casts doubt on
this statement made in reading. He argues that Chevalier owned numerous properties and was wealthy. Furthermore, she points out that he sold some of his properties and it took time to get his money.
Second, reading mentions that there was no way that Chevalier could have remembered each and every word from famous writer Voltaire. So, he claims that information written in memoir was doubtful. In contrary, lecture refutes that by saying that Chevalier used to write all detail about his conversation with writer in his journal.As a result, events presented in memoir was original.
Third, reading claims that Chevalier must have bribed other prisoners to help in breaking through jail. It was evidenced by the hole in the ceiling created by metal rod. On the other hand, lecture states that he escaped via ceiling as he mentioned, but there was no evidence that he bribed other prisoners. In addition, she points that other prisoners were stronger than him and still they did not bribe. As a consequence, lecture successfully casts doubt on points made in reading.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... validity of events and stories depicted in the memoir created by Chevalier. Read...
^^^
Line 8, column 331, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
...conversation with writer in his journal.As a result, events presented in memoir wa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, second, so, still, third, while, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1340.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 262.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11450381679 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49996212313 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526717557252 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.23620309051 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.0501512856 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.75 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.375 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06452816374 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.09492273731 171% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.3589403974 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.