Whistle's painting women in a white dress is similar to recently found painting
The reading and the listening both are about the painting of the young woman in a white dress which resembles the painting of James Whistler. The author of the reading passage believes that this painting is made by Whistler. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the reading passage. He thinks that these points are not strong to prove this painting is made by Whistler.
First of all, the author thinks that three years after the Whistler’s death, this painting was included in an exhibition of paintings. It was organized by a close friend of Whistler, so he attributed this painting to Whistler. This point is challenged by the lecturer. He points out that in that exhibition, there was a various collection of paintings. So, just because it was organized by Whistler’s friend, it does not mean that it was the same painting.
Secondly, the author states that the woman in the painting clearly resembles the women in ‘Symphony in white’ and the same style and arrangement of the micro chromatic palate in white and grey looks like Whistler’s painting. The lecturer refutes this point and asserts that in those days, the women face was very famous among the painters. These colors are commonly used by the other painters too. They were very popular colors, so it does not prove that this is Whistler’s painting.
Finally, the author mentions that tiny paintings of butterflies in the right lower corner of the painting were the whistler’s style. The lecturer, on the other hand, states that tiny butterflies are in different shapes and in different colors than Whistler’s painting. Additionally, he used to draw butterflies in the upper left corner of the painting. So, if we look at the painting very closely, it does not look like Whistler’s painting.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...that this painting is made by Whistler. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ove this painting is made by Whistler. First of all, the author thinks that thr...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ot mean that it was the same painting. Secondly, the author states that the wom...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that this is Whistler's painting. Finally, the author mentions that tiny p...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ot look like Whistler's painting.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, look, second, secondly, so, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 299.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09698996656 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97842564786 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.441471571906 0.540411800872 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 442.8 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 3.25607064018 307% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.0838301767 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6470588235 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5882352941 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94117647059 7.06452816374 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173489396804 0.272083759551 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657864228682 0.0996497079465 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785705728928 0.0662205650399 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123939709302 0.162205337803 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554157141738 0.0443174109184 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.42419426049 85% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.