The widespread phenomenon of mass communication through cell phones and the internet has spurred enormous controversy. Many believe that people have become less able to build bonds with friends and family members. It is impossible to deny that social media is constantly changing the way that people interact with one another. With the advent of new technologies that allow for non-simultaneous and distant interaction, people all over the world are now able to build relationships in a way that was formerly not possible. Some might say that this is a negative trend, but this new development opens up for unique and effective connections.
Both the reading passage and the lecturer discuss effects of social media to people’s life. First of all, the author claim that, even though many thinks social media developments are negative, it comes with its own positive outomes. While the professor is more skeptical, he says within online communication, skims and cyber bullying among children and stealing money has increased. Moreover, he also compares the data from 1987 and 2004 about social connections among people and he tells that due to the social media reform it has been changed, resulted with negative outcomes.
According to the author, he excepts that social media has changed the communication among one and another, but it has also opened new doors regarding to this situation. People have built interactive communication not only with their inner circle but around the world. Meanwhile the lecturer argues that according to the data from 1987 and 2004 American people has become more alone, they tend to know less neighboors nowadays and people who has no one to talk almost doubled in between this mentioned time periods and increased to 25%.
The other important point made by the author is within social media people now able to built online communities and find someone whom share a common interest when this situation is quite complicated in the real world. The lecturer, he admits that finding an online community provide the individual with benefits, however, he highlights that throughout this online communities people are not able to develop real realitionships. Moreover, he adds, people are not involving in social clubs like they used to before.
Finally, the writer points out that social media also help people to find their voice and it allows people to be heard from the others where the lecturer claims that this situation makes people only talking behind the keyboards and leave people with lack of confident in the physcial life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...heir inner circle but around the world. Meanwhile the lecturer argues that according to t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 455, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...alitionships. Moreover, he adds, people are not involving in social clubs like they used to befor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1621.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 314.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16242038217 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51025928533 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563694267516 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.6869611072 49.2860985944 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.363636364 110.228320801 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5454545455 21.698381199 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63636363636 7.06452816374 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18530066348 0.272083759551 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792487928782 0.0996497079465 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0324309998728 0.0662205650399 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11958353537 0.162205337803 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0159994215683 0.0443174109184 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.3589403974 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 53.8541721854 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.