work 4 days of the week instead of 5 days of the week.
The reading specifies that it is better for employees to work four days a week instead of five days. However, the professor casts doubt on this claim and provides three reasons to reject the mentioned point in the reading.
First, based on the reading, employees feel more rested and alert by shortened workweek and because of that, the company does not need to hire additional persons to accomplish the same amount of work. In contrast, the lecturer says that declining the working hours will not lead to not hiring extra employees. Adding new employees require health insurance, additional computers, and more space which costs money for the company.
Second, the article specifies that offering a lesser workweek will diminish the unemployment rate. Nevertheless, the professor implies that because of the cost of hiring new employees, no additional jobs will be created by this method. Also, the employees have more expectations from employees to work better. This expectation leads to overtime working which is unpleasant for employees.
Third, according to the reading, the option of a four day workweek will enhance the quality of employees' life, because not only can spend extra time with their family but also, they can pursue interests. On the other hand, the man explains that there is a risk that can reduce the quality of employees' work and job stability which can make them lose their job, especially in bad economic times. Also, since the supervision position needs to work 5 days in a week, the people will lose their chance to advance in their job.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, third, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1309.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 260.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03461538462 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54721973971 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3572850472 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.083333333 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20537007755 0.272083759551 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0819699849904 0.0996497079465 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124562277719 0.0662205650399 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134479990852 0.162205337803 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0987011257162 0.0443174109184 223% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.