The reading passage and lecture are both about the protection of forest with the assists of funds from the international conversation technique, whereas, the reading passage suggest that the funds will help in recovering the problem of deforestation. On the contrary, the lecture claims doubt on the reasons of the reading passage by mentioning three defensive points.
First of all, according to the author of the reading separations of funds to the people of farmers, government, and landowner allow them to get rid of logging. For example, giving funds to these persons including agriculture will help to reduce the problem as they will resist from the forests. However, the speaker refutes these ideas by stating his points that those obstructions created in the forest are due to the agricultural farming. Furthermore, he also says that farmer use the pesticides and fertilizer which are the main cause to create the destruction of forest. Thus, he mentions that logging is not the only problem.
Secondly, the reading passage demonstrate that funds given to the village and tribal communities will aids to continue their life and will not pressure to continue forest. For supporting instances, he states that those money will used by the local people in educations, health services and nutritional aid. On the other hand, the lecture disputes this arguments. He explains the facts that those funds will not be given to the government nor to the local people as they are handed to forest owner. These peoples may not distribute funds to local people, thereby administrating in solving problems.
Finally, the author of the reading claims that global concerns to protect the biodiversity will help people to escape from using forests. Human that use the forest for foods, shelter, clothing and medicinal herbs will reduce in amount as the funds will provide to them. Despite the claims of the author, the lecture refutes this statements. He thinks that promotions of biodiversity for planting tree will not promote the goods of biodiversity. Therefore, he suggests that depending on the money provided by funds is rather inadequate.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'aid'
Suggestion: aid
...the village and tribal communities will aids to continue their life and will not pre...
^^^^
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this money' or 'those moneys', 'those monies'?
Suggestion: this money; those moneys; those monies
...or supporting instances, he states that those money will used by the local people in educat...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'use'
Suggestion: use
...tances, he states that those money will used by the local people in educations, heal...
^^^^
Line 5, column 348, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...On the other hand, the lecture disputes this arguments. He explains the facts that t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 325, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...aims of the author, the lecture refutes this statements. He thinks that promotions o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, whereas, for example, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 30.3222958057 165% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1801.0 1373.03311258 131% => OK
No of words: 345.0 270.72406181 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22028985507 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7558252065 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498550724638 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 540.9 419.366225166 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4094025597 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.941176471 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2941176471 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.82352941176 7.06452816374 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165099648413 0.272083759551 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531030931766 0.0996497079465 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434269662343 0.0662205650399 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10584492316 0.162205337803 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0134878090266 0.0443174109184 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 63.6247240618 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.