Yellowstone park
Both the reading and lecture are talking about the rule which let the farms burn with no human interference to shut it down. While the reading attributes that this policy is absolutely wrong, the lecture provides reasons to show that how it can be the right decision.
According to the reading passage, by doing this policy, not only we cannot maintain the ecosystem balanced but also we are letting it be destroyed. The author asserts that catastrophic fires like what happened at Yellowstone national park, cause severely and irrevocably damages, However, the professor refutes this by saying that although it destroys the plants, it helps to fertilize the soil. Dead materials go to soil and make it rich in the way more trees and vegetation can grow.
Another fact mentioned in the reading is, in this phenomenon, many animal species especially small ones either perish or never back to their habitats. He examples the Yellowstone park dwellers which few of them have returned to park after the fire. The professor indicates that by growing new type of vegetation, new kinds of animals choose the park for the living. For instance, he said that rabbits became a new dweller of the park after the fire.
Finally, in contrast to the reading arguments that decrease in tourist attraction of the yellow park, the burned-forest, had been occurred, the lecturer says that it was not just due to fire but also related to the economic crisis. He claims that the fire happened exactly at the same time as the economic crisis in which can explains why other unburned-parks had been dealing with this problem either.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that how it can be the right decision. According to the reading passage, by doi...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ay more trees and vegetation can grow. Another fact mentioned in the reading is...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ew dweller of the park after the fire. Finally, in contrast to the reading argu...
^^
Line 4, column 328, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'explain'
Suggestion: explain
...ime as the economic crisis in which can explains why other unburned-parks had been deali...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, so, well, while, for instance, in contrast, talking about, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1341.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 272.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93014705882 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58580841686 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617647058824 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3711177174 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.909090909 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7272727273 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.27272727273 7.06452816374 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245989131465 0.272083759551 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0939350311036 0.0996497079465 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123440166089 0.0662205650399 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131415080516 0.162205337803 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101833329311 0.0443174109184 230% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.