People are moving from rural areas to big cities. Is it good or bad?
The important effect of people are moving from rural areas to big cities which was always debatable has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of many people are migrating to cities from rural area has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend in the recent year on people migration. It good for the people that they are moving to big cities from rural area for good education, job opportunities and luxury lifestyle etc. This essay will elaborate how people are moving to big cities is good for their happy living and it is bad for the ruler areas because it cause low population, low employment.
At the outset, there are numerous reason why people are migrating to cities but the most conspicuous one steam's from the fact that people will spend happy life in cities area. As an illustration, a current study shows in America two hundred people of Biratchowk village migrated to New work in 2017 and got a good job in New work. In addition, people will spend the standard life style, used advanced technology, good place for entertainment like movie in the theatre, comedy show, dancing program etc. Thus, it helps people for their professional and personal development.
Nevertheless, there remains same drawbacks which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of people migration to big cities but the most alarming one is rooted from the fact that if people move to cities then the rural area will be under develop, less population, lack of lob employee, and lack of transportation etc. Thus, people should stay in the rural area.
From what has been discussed above it can be concluded that the impact of people migration to big cities is prominent but the way of people staying in the village area should be well handled.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 601, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'causes'?
Suggestion: causes
...t is bad for the ruler areas because it cause low population, low employment. At...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, nevertheless, so, then, thus, well, as to, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 301.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95016611296 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62835424664 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 139.433497537 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504983388704 0.580463131201 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 457.2 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.9147275219 50.4703680194 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.454545455 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3636363636 20.9669160288 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72727272727 7.25397266985 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.461100622956 0.242375264174 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.20683050481 0.0925447433944 223% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105113660055 0.071462118173 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.292796619284 0.151781067708 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128988372729 0.0609392437508 212% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 53.1260098522 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.9458128079 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.5310837438 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.32886699507 95% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 55.0591133005 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.