The reading passage and lecture are both disccus causes of sea otter declination. The writer believes that otter declined due to environmental pollution in Alaskan coast, he gives three hypothesis to illustrate his view. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. She says, attacks by predators is the mainly cause of decrease sea otter popullation.
First, the author mentions, a pollution is the more likely cause of decline in otter popullation, he says there are many sourses of industrial chemical that could decrease otter resistance to life - threating infections and could inderictly cause otter death. This point challenged by lecturer. She suggests that, we do did not find dead otter in the shore of Alaskan coast, moreover, if there are dead otter, this is due to predators, that kill them therefore, they are seen in the shore of coast.
Second, the author argues, there are many other mammals also decline, that is indecates the presence of pollution. This argument reputted by professor. She states,however, the predators like ocra prey on other whales, but these whales extinicted, since orca need other type of animals to prey on, therefore orca depend on see otter for their food, this explain that extiniction of otter is from predators not from pollution.
Finally, the author elaborats on pollution hypothesis, he believes, the pollution explain uneven pattewrn of otter decline. In the other hand, The professors points out, this pattern is a better explanation that predators are the main cause of declination. She mentions, some places with tremedous number of predators, furthermore, some places have a large otter in shallow place, that explain uneven pattern of declination, this due to the difirance in the predators and otter from place to place.
The reading passage and lecture are both disccus causes of sea otter declination. The writer believes that otter declined due to environmental pollution in Alaskan coast, he gives three hypothesis to illustrate his view. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. She says, attacks by predators is the mainly cause of decrease sea otter popullation.
First, the author mentions, a pollution is the more likely cause of decline in otter popullation, he says there are many sourses of industrial chemical that could decrease otter resistance to life - threating infections and could inderictly cause otter death. This point challenged by lecturer. She suggests that, we do did not find dead otter in the shore of Alaskan coast, moreover, if there are dead otter, this is due to predators, that kill them therefore, they are seen in the shore of coast.
Second, the author argues, there are many other mammals also decline, that is indecates the presence of pollution. This argument reputted by professor. She states,however, the predators like ocra prey on other whales, but these whales extinicted, since orca need other type of animals to prey on, therefore orca depend on see otter for their food, this explain that extiniction of otter is from predators not from pollution.
Finally, the author elaborats on pollution hypothesis, he believes, the pollution explain uneven pattewrn of otter decline. In the other hand, The professors points out, this pattern is a better explanation that predators are the main cause of declination. She mentions, some places with tremedous number of predators, furthermore, some places have a large otter in shallow place, that explain uneven pattern of declination, this due to the difirance in the predators and otter from place to place.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-04 | talelaldabous | 75 | view |
- Now days with the increase in the complexity of life there are many duties put on individuals especially young people to improve and facilitate their life Whether it is parameter things for young people to plan or organize in their life or not this can be 60
- Development of yougster behavior is very crucial thing whether movies and television have negative or positive impact on teenager iswieghed in diffirent aspects some people believe that watching movies and televition has negative effect on their kids othe 76
- Advacement of technology now days has uttily influence on all aspect of our life whether the technology has decrease kids creation than in the past or not can be weighted in many aspects in perspective I do not concur with this statement that technology r 76
- The reading passage and lecture are talking about distinction which has occured to species at the end of the Triassic period The writer claims three reasons for these extinction However the lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article She believes non of 60
- Pollution is causes a big problem for our environment every one concern presence of pollution Whether pollution is less in past than it to day This can be weighed in many aspects although there are a lot of sources of pollution in the past years especiall 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading passage and lecture are both...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'hypothesis' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'hypotheses', 'hypothesises'.
Suggestion: hypotheses; hypothesises
...lution in Alaskan coast, he gives three hypothesis to illustrate his view. The lecturer ca...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...hree hypothesis to illustrate his view. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in a...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...use of decrease sea otter popullation. First, the author mentions, a pollution ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 36, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'pollution'.
Suggestion: pollution
...on. First, the author mentions, a pollution is the more likely cause of decline in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., they are seen in the shore of coast. Second, the author argues, there are man...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , however
...gument reputted by professor. She states,however, the predators like ocra prey on other ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...these whales extinicted, since orca need other type of animals to prey on, theref...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is from predators not from pollution. Finally, the author elaborats on polluti...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 505, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...redators and otter from place to place.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.01324503311 339% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1507.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 287.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25087108014 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76965609564 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550522648084 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 3.25607064018 553% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.149342853 49.2860985944 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.923076923 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0769230769 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.401551651575 0.272083759551 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153591986776 0.0996497079465 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.179813915235 0.0662205650399 272% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.284675505486 0.162205337803 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.286683081694 0.0443174109184 647% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.