The best way to reslove international environmenf problems is to increase the cost of fuel for car and other vehicles. Agree or Disagree?
Natural resources have been becoming a rudimentary part in promoting industrialization for decades. While it is necessary that practical solutions be made to alleviate their threatening impacts on the environment on the worldwide scale, I think raising the cost of fuel for transportation may be not radical for many reasons.
On the one hand, it is obvious that higher cost of fuel does wonder for the enviroment in many ways. First of all, it reduces the rate of global warming. With the increased fuel cost, it means people are more inclined to seek out other more economical modes of transportations like bus and bicycles. As a results, the number of traffic conjestion will reduce, thereby cutting down a considerable amount of greenhouse gases like co2 and metan. Another profounded point is that it saves endangered species from extinction. Due to greenhouse effects, several living creatures have lost their living habitats, thereby doing the ecosystem a disservice. For example, with the increasing global temperature, the ices in the North Poles is melting at an uncontrolled rate, heavily affecting chain of food there, leading to a significant reduction to the host of great bears and whales.
On the other hand, fuel undoubted serves an important function in the economy. At the individual level, an incease in the cost of fuel has an adverse bearing on residents' daily life. For example, on the opposite angle, manuveuring by public transports and bicycles may be extremely annoying it is either or overcrowded or time-consuming. At the international level, the industry industry may suffer losses because the less people pay for fuel, the more inventory is made, which may lead to budget deficit to maintain current operation and utility.
In conclusion, thought resolving global obstacles relating to environment is vital, I believe there is a better way to cope with such problems rather than uplifting the cost of fuel.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-08 | Khanh@2603 | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 303, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a result' or simply 'results'?
Suggestion: a result; results
...ansportations like bus and bicycles. As a results, the number of traffic conjestion will ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 370, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: industry
...suming. At the international level, the industry industry may suffer losses because the less peop...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 418, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... industry may suffer losses because the less people pay for fuel, the more inventory...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, so, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1630.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20766773163 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00192686166 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623003194888 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8962379292 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.428571429 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3571428571 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208447971846 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624007001968 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495462171847 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122116626649 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00796056318826 0.056905535591 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.