Nowadays, people’s migration to developed countries has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the world, which leads to a moot question “whether the migration threatens the lifestyle of developed countries due to industrialization or not?”. It is a widely held view that immigration to developed areas is highly beneficial, whereas I tend to believe that one must weigh up carefully the pros and cons of this issue.
To begin with, it is a common belief that immigration to developed countries plays a vital role in the fast-changing world. To put into consideration, I express why I support this idea. First and foremost is that immigrants will be able to find a lucrative job and increase their earning capacity as well as promote the living standard. Secondly, since the developed countries encounter with the crisis of negative population growth, they can compensate their countries for professional workforce. In addition to this information, it should be mentioned that immigrants would be the best source of economic growth, so developed countries will be able to increase their earning capacity. A very intangible example to illustrate would be western countries that suffer from lack of skilled worker.
However, there is no doubt that immigration to the developed countries provides people with various negative points. It should be taken into account that overcrowding is one of the most important problems that threaten the developed countries due to industrialization. Moreover, immigrants achieve the best job opportunities, therefore the host country will be deprived of a rewarding job or other facilities.
To recapitulate, I entirely agree that migration to the developed countries in order to promote industrialization must be taken into consideration. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce stricter legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 380, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , but
...n, despite few problems due to migration,but overall migration helped theses countri...
^^^^
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: K
... of these countries. For example, The U.K where many people migrated for better o...
^
Line 5, column 57, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oblems cropped up in developed countries due to migration. Problems like xenophob...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, then, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 31.9359605911 147% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 283.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44169611307 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9910820682 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505300353357 0.580463131201 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 470.7 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7892703766 50.4703680194 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.666666667 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8666666667 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277759862641 0.242375264174 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110991534868 0.0925447433944 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528843774424 0.071462118173 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185386495292 0.151781067708 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462608481313 0.0609392437508 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.32886699507 94% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.