Grouping of students according to their academic abilities is common in myriads of educational institutions. There is a heated debate whether ability groups have advantages or disadvantages in academic circles. This essay will discuss convenience of education as an advantage and lower consideration of pupil groups whose achievements are lower as a disadvantage of this process.
Firstly, separating students according to their capabilities makes education easier for students as well as teachers. This allows them to continue teaching and learning at the same pace. If clever and poor students are mixed, the latter cannot be given special attention because it will bore the former. Therefore, ability groups help to pursue studies at a moderate speed without hindrance to others.
On the other hand, student groupings based on learning abilities creates a social consensus among humans. Higher performing teams are considered as brilliant and they get more benefits. Members of student groups who underperforms feel inferiority and they may tend to prone mental disorders such as depression. Hence, this grouping concept negatively affects the psychological behavior of pupils who are not able to perform well.
In summary, ability groups make education more convenient as well as interesting and negatively affects the mindsets of pupils whose performance is not satisfactory. In my opinion, student groupings should be continued while giving more and extra attention to student sets who show lower academic results.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 431, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...upils who are not able to perform well. In summary, ability groups makes educati...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, in summary, such as, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1287.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 227.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66960352423 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.999647427 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 139.433497537 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625550660793 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.4517959389 50.4703680194 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.0 104.977214359 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4615384615 20.9669160288 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61538461538 7.25397266985 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256010336734 0.242375264174 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0939482527001 0.0925447433944 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0901726029078 0.071462118173 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161823194008 0.151781067708 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522145100224 0.0609392437508 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 12.6369458128 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 53.1260098522 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.31 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.